Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189922›Full record

ArticleJournal of plastic and reconstructive surgery2025

Subclinical Extension of Pigmented Nodular Type Basal Cell Carcinoma in Japanese Patients.

Masaki Fujioka, Miho Noguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masaki FujiokaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Miho NoguchiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Japan, resection of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) with a margin of at least 4 mm is recommended by guidelines. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical margins for well-defined pigmented BCC in Japanese patients. Methods: Between 2010 and 2017, 25 cases of well-defined nodular pigmented BCC measuring 20 mm or less on the face were surgically resected with a margin of 4 to 5 mm, and pathological measurements were performed at the National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center. The measurement item was subclinical extension of the tumor, which is the difference in distance between the actual tumor border confirmed under a microscope and apparent tumor border determined clinically from the outside. Results: Subclinical extension of the tumors ranged from 0 to 3.5 mm, with a mean of 1.0 mm, standard deviation of 1.0 mm, and 95% confidence interval of 0.7 to 1.6 mm. Regardless of the malignancy grade, resection with a 3-mm margin for nodular pigmented BCC with a clear border and long diameter of 20 mm or less was effective, with a complete resection rate of 96%. Conclusions: Surgical excision with a 3-mm margin is reliable treatment for well-defined, primary pigmented BCC, with a complete removal rate of 96%. These results suggest that resection margins recommended in guidelines can be narrowed in Japanese patients with BCC.

Indexed as

basal cell carcinomaguidelinesJapanese patientsresection marginsubclinical extensionsurgical excision

Identifiers

PMID41189922
PMCPMC12582859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.