Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189876›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2025

Toxicological and nutritional evaluation of plant cell cultures from scurvy grass (

Felicianna, Ho Lam Cheung, Emily Kwun Kwan Lo, Fangfei Zhang, Hoi Kit Matthew Leung, Marsena Jasiel Ismaiah, Natalia Rosa-Sibakov, Valeria Iannone, Carlos Gómez-Gallego, Marjukka Kolehmainen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Felicianna *School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ho Lam Cheung *School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Emily Kwun Kwan LoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Fangfei ZhangSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hoi Kit Matthew LeungSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Marsena Jasiel IsmaiahSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Natalia Rosa-SibakovVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Espoo, Finland.
Valeria IannoneInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Carlos Gómez-GallegoInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Marjukka KolehmainenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Heiko RischerVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Espoo, Finland.
Emilia NordlundVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Espoo, Finland.
Hani El-NezamiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Plant cell culture (PCC) technology is currently being developed to produce plant foods partially decoupled from traditional agriculture practices. By now, the safety of the ingredients produced by PCC technology for food or nutritional purposes has to be tested. Materials and methods: In this study, the oral safety and toxicity of two novel PCCs, scurvy grass (SG) (Cochlearia danica) and rowan (RW) (Sorbus aucuparia), and to characterize the macro- and micronutrient quality, including proteomic profiles, to identify potential allergens. Results: Nutritional composition analysis showed that both SG and RW PCCs profiles are comparable to other berry cell lines with a good amount of protein, dietary fibre and vitamins. Potential allergens were identified via proteomics based on structural similarity. The acute and subacute toxicity profiles of the PCC samples were evaluated based on OECD guidelines. For both PCCs, no deaths, behavioral changes, nor metabolic effects were observed at 2000 mg/kg. In the 28-day repeated oral exposure subacute toxicity study, no mortality or significant adverse clinical, hematological, or metabolic effects were observed for either SG or RW. Discussion: These findings indicate that the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for both PCCs exceeds 2000 mg/kg. Overall, our findings indicate that the consumption of these PCCs could be considered safe and non-toxic, although further assessments on potential allergens and phytohormone accumulation are necessary to fully ensure consumer safety. This study highlights the oral safety of PCCs for consideration as a novel food ingredient and serve as a basis for evaluating toxicological impacts of PCCs.

Indexed as

acute toxicitybiosafetycellular agriculturefood ingredientsnutritional compositionsubacute toxicity

Identifiers

PMID41189876
PMCPMC12580138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.