ArticleCureus2025
Misinformation in YouTube Videos About Chiropractic Treatment for Otitis Media.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study analyzes the prevalence and characteristics of misinformation in YouTube videos about chiropractic treatment for otitis media (OM).
methodsYouTube was searched in January 2023 (Incognito mode, US region) using the terms "chiropractic treatment for otitis media", "chiropractic ear infection", and "chiropractic ear problems". The first 50 English-language videos ranked by relevance were evaluated. Two independent reviewers extracted metadata (views, duration, likes, comments, upload source) and coded for references to evidence-based therapies, chiropractic techniques, and misinformation themes ("fixing" nerves or the Eustachian tube); a third reviewer resolved discrepancies. Descriptive statistics summarized video characteristics and engagement. A parallel PubMed search identified published literature on the most commonly mentioned techniques.
resultsFifty videos accrued 2,600,209 views, with a mean of 192 seconds, and generated 21,102 likes and 1,766 comments. Chiropractors produced 42 videos (84% of the content); hospital or academic channels contributed two videos (4%). Only three videos (6%) cited scientific sources. Twenty-five videos claimed that chiropractic manipulation could "fix" the Eustachian tube, and 14 videos (28%) asserted nerve correction; none mentioned antibiotics or tympanostomy tubes. Upper‑cervical adjustments (32 videos, 64%) and ear‑massage maneuvers (25 videos, 50%) were the most frequently promoted techniques, despite limited or low‑quality supporting evidence in published literature.
conclusionsMisinformation about chiropractic treatment for OM is widespread and highly viewed on YouTube. The omission of proven therapies and promotion of unverified claims pose risks for delayed care and preventable harm. Efforts from clinicians, professional societies, educators, and platforms are needed to elevate accurate content, promote media literacy, and reduce exposure to misleading medical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.