Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189843›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Prospective Comparative Study of Shouldice Inguinal Hernia Repair and Total Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Single-Center Experience.

Chintankumar Patel, Dinesh Prasad, Vipul D Yagnik, Prema R Choudhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chintankumar PatelSurgery, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research, Surat, IND.
Dinesh PrasadGeneral Surgery, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research, Surat, IND.
Vipul D YagnikSurgery, Banas Medical College and Research Institute, Palanpur, IND.
Prema R ChoudharyPhysiology, Banas Medical College and Research Institute, Palanpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 20 million hernias are repaired annually. This study aimed to compare two techniques, Shouldice hernia repair and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic hernia repair, in terms of various measures, such as recurrence rates, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of postoperative stay.

methodsA single-center, prospective, comparative study was conducted among patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital with a diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia (direct or indirect). A total of 125 patients underwent surgery. Among these patients, 53 had bilateral inguinal hernias, and 72 had unilateral inguinal hernias. The patients were alternatively allocated (based on their outpatient department visits) to either TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair or Shouldice hernia repair. All patients were followed up both in the short term (on postoperative days 1, 3, and 15) and in the long term (at 6 and 12 months) on an outpatient basis. Follow-up included a clinical examination and ultrasonography to assess recurrence and complications, such as postoperative pain, seroma formation, testicular atrophy, inguinodynia, foreign body sensation, and recurrence.

resultsThe mean operative durations of the Shouldice and laparoscopic TAPP groups were 82.7 ± 12.9 minutes and 107.6 ± 13.8 minutes, respectively, indicating that significantly less time was needed for Shouldice repair (p = 0.001). Postoperative pain was measured on days 1, 3, and 15, and visual analog scale scores were compared. Comparing the two procedures for pain on days 1, 3, and 15, there was less pain associated with the Shouldice repair than with the TAPP repair. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2199). Seroma formation and testicular atrophy were significantly greater in the TAPP group than in the Shouldice group (p = 0.047 and p = 0.0194, respectively). Inguinodynia was significantly greater in the laparoscopic group than in the Shouldice repair group (p = 0.029). At the 12-month follow-up, there was one case of recurrence after Shouldice hernia repair (1.1%) and two cases of recurrence after TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair (2.2%). This difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

conclusionThe operative time was significantly shorter for Shouldice than for laparoscopic TAPP. Postoperative pain and recurrence rates were comparable in both groups, whereas the seroma and testicular atrophy rates were higher in the laparoscopic TAPP group.

Indexed as

inguinal herniainguinodyniashouldice repairtesticular atrophytransabdominal preperitoneal (tapp)

Identifiers

PMID41189843
PMCPMC12580579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.