ArticleCureus2025
Comparing Foundation Doctors' Confidence and Dermatologists' Expectations in Inpatient Referrals: A Multi-site Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInpatient dermatology referrals rely on non-dermatologist doctors to recognise and communicate skin problems effectively. Limited dermatology training during medical school may leave newly qualified doctors underprepared for this responsibility.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate foundation doctors' confidence in core dermatological skills and knowledge and to compare these with dermatologists' expectations based on observed inpatient referral quality across two UK hospital sites.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted at Basildon University Hospital and Northampton General Hospital in England. Foundation year doctors (n = 87) completed questionnaires assessing confidence (on Likert scales 1-5) in describing skin lesions, identifying urgent dermatological conditions, knowing what information to include in referrals, and using common treatments. Dermatologists (n = 8) were surveyed on expected referral information, common deficiencies, and examples of inappropriate referrals. Descriptive statistics were used to compare responses.
resultsAcross both sites, most foundation doctors reported low confidence in describing skin lesions and identifying serious dermatoses: only 8-29% rated themselves "confident" or "extremely confident." Over 65% were not confident in using different emollients (only 2-10% felt confident). Only ~30% of foundation doctors were aware of the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) handbook. Dermatologists consistently expected detailed clinical information in referrals but noted that many lacked these elements. Common conditions like eczema, psoriasis, scabies, and drug eruptions were cited as being referred inappropriately.
conclusionsFoundation doctors reported limited confidence in fundamental dermatological assessment and management skills, reflecting inadequate undergraduate dermatology training. Dermatologists observed corresponding deficiencies in referral quality. This mismatch may lead to suboptimal patient management and unnecessary specialist referrals. Improving dermatology education for medical students and resident doctors is recommended, alongside clearer referral guidelines and continued dermatologist feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.