ArticleRSC advances2025
Chemometrics-driven discrimination of flue-cured tobacco aroma types
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction and visual analysis of flue-cured tobacco aroma types based on machine learning and feature derivation.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Aromatic compounds analysis of Guizhou honey-sweet tobacco.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Interaction between microorganisms and flavour products during cigar fermentation promoted by citrus Reticulata-"Chenpi" derivedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, a novel classification model for flue-cured tobacco aroma types is presented by integrating chemometric modeling with quantitative aroma component analysis. Three representative types of flue-cured tobacco samples were selected for their distinct flavor profiles and commercial importance. Sensory characteristics were quantified by descriptive analysis of a trained panel. Gas chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) was employed to rapidly identify the aroma components. The aroma types of flue-cured tobacco were studied using correlation analysis, hierarchical clustering, principal component analysis (PCA), and discriminant analysis. In total, 31 aroma components of flue-cured tobacco were identified by GC-MS/MS. Each flue-cured tobacco sample was first assigned an aroma style based on geographical origin and subsequently corroborated by the descriptive panel. Correlation analysis successfully identified compounds related to aroma substances and the descriptive analysis indices of flue-cured tobacco. Cluster analysis cleanly segregated the samples into the three predefined aroma types. Six principal components were extracted from the PCA to construct the discriminant model. Internal and cross-validation both confirmed the discriminant model's reliability and accuracy. This study evaluated the potential of using tobacco aroma components to distinguish and classify flue-cured tobacco aroma types.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.