ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Approach to Cataract Surgery in a Case with Microcornea and Coloboma.
Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Phacoemulsification in Microcornea versus Normal-Sized Corneas.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Cataract surgery in patients with microcornea and ocular coloboma poses unique surgical and postoperative challenges. The presence of a small corneal diameter, abnormal ocular anatomy, and the risk of postoperative complications require a highly individualized approach. This case highlights the difficulties encountered in biometry measurement and the development of capsular contraction syndrome following phacoemulsification surgery. Case report: A 38-year-old male with bilateral ocular coloboma, microcornea, and nystagmus presented with progressive vision loss. Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was performed in the right eye. Preoperative planning included keratometry by corneal topography and axial length confirmation with both optical and ultrasonic biometry. Despite meticulous planning, a postoperative refractive error and rapid anterior capsular fibrosis developed. Although neodymium: YAG capsulotomy was recommended, the patient declined the intervention. Discussion: In eyes with microcornea and coloboma, accurate biometry is often hindered by structural abnormalities, increasing the risk of refractive surprises. Additionally, the risk of intraoperative complications such as capsulorhexis extension, zonular dialysis, or vitreous prolapse is heightened. Postoperatively, capsular contraction syndrome may develop rapidly, especially if subcapsular epithelial cells are not adequately removed. This case emphasizes the need for careful intraoperative management and vigilant postoperative monitoring. Conclusion: Cataract surgery in patients with microcornea and coloboma requires thorough preoperative assessment, surgical expertise, and tailored postoperative care. Awareness of potential complications such as biometric inaccuracy and capsular contraction is essential to optimize outcomes in these complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.