Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189767›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Caliper measurements of femoral resection thickness in kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty are accurate and reproducible.

Alexander J Nedopil, Saahil Sandhar, Stephen M Howell, Maury L Hull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander J NedopilDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery König-Ludwig-Haus, University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.
Saahil SandharSchool of Medicine University of California Davis Sacramento California USA.
Stephen M HowellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of California Davis Davis California USA.
Maury L HullDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of California Davis Davis California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-4589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To resurface the patient's knee to the prearthritic state in caliper-verified kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty, the thickness of femoral resections after adjusting for saw blade kerf and wear should equal the femoral component. The primary objective was to determine accuracy of caliper measurement by quantifying the systematic (i.e., bias) and random (i.e., precision) errors of both unworn and worn articular surfaces from varus and valgus knees. The secondary objective was to assess reproducibility. Methods: In this diagnostic test study, thickness of each femoral resection from the first patients with 20 varus knees and the first patients with 20 valgus knees was measured by the surgeon using a caliper with 10 mm wide jaws. Subsequently, an optical method established the gold standard thickness. From the difference between caliper and optical measurements, the mean error (bias) and the standard deviation of the error (precision) were computed. Three observers measured resection thickness in three trials on both worn and unworn surfaces for 12 patients with varus knees. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by computing the variance components from a two-factor analysis of variance and corresponding intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values. Results: For worn and unworn surfaces from both varus and valgus knees, the bias was negligible and the precision was less than or equal to the 0.5 mm resolution of the caliper. For worn and unworn surfaces from varus knees, ICC values were > 0.95 for both repeatability and reproducibility. Conclusions: The caliper used in this study is a sufficiently accurate tool for measuring resection thickness intraoperatively on worn and unworn femoral articular surfaces regardless of knee deformity. The error is less than the resolution of the caliper and the reproducibility is high thus giving surgeons confidence that the native limb and joint lines will be restored provided that the measured resection thickness after correcting for sawblade kerf and wear equals the femoral component thickness to within ±0.5 mm. Level of Evidence: N/A.

Indexed as

intraclass correlation coefficientknee replacementprecisionrandom errorrepeatabilitysystematic error

Identifiers

PMID41189767
PMCPMC12581645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.