ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Only 1 in 10 patients achieve their rehabilitation goals at 1 year and 1 in 4 at 2 years following ACL reconstruction: An analysis of 907 patients.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying Differential Learning During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Basketball Single-Case Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Only 1 in 10 patients achieve their rehabilitation goals at 1 year and 1 in 4 at 2 years following ACL reconstruction: An analysis of 907 patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe and compare demographic characteristics, perceived knee function and muscle function between patients who achieved their rehabilitation goals and those who did not at 1 and 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Data on patient demographics, results from patient-reported outcomes (PROs), muscle strength and hop performance tests were extracted from Project ACL in April 2024. Patients treated with primary ACL reconstruction, ≥15 years of age at surgery, with complete data from PROs, muscle strength and hop performance tests at 1 or 2 years after surgery were included. The outcomes included comparisons of (1) demographics, (2) PROs and (3) muscle function tests between patients who achieved and those who did not achieve their rehabilitation goals at 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Alpha level was set at Results: At 1 year, 762 patients were included of whom 100 patients (13%) achieved their rehabilitation goals. At 2 years, 145 patients were included, of whom 40 patients (28%) achieved their rehabilitation goals. Patients who achieved their rehabilitation goals at 1 year and 2 years reported less severe perceived knee symptoms ( Conclusions: Patients who achieve their rehabilitation goals after ACL reconstruction are characterized by higher perceived knee function, less severe knee symptoms, higher knee self-efficacy, more positive emotions, stronger confidence and higher risk appraisal to return to sport and engage in higher activity levels compared to patients who did not achieve their rehabilitation goals. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective observational registry study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.