Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189759›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Learning causal effect of physical activity distribution: an application of functional treatment effect estimation with unmeasured confounding.

Zhuoxin Long, Xiaoke Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhuoxin LongDepartment of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Xiaoke ZhangDepartment of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collects minute-level physical activity data by accelerometers as an important component of the survey to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the US. In this paper, we analyze the NHANES accelerometry data to study the causal effect of physical activity distribution on body fat percentage, where the treatment is a function/distribution. In the presence of unmeasured confounding, we propose to integrate cross-fitting with two methods under the proximal causal inference framework to estimate the functional treatment effect. The two methods are shown practically appealing via both simulation and an NHANES accelerometry data analysis. In the analysis of the NHANES accelerometry data, the two methods also lead to a more intuitive and interpretable causal relationship between physical activity distribution and body fat percentage.

Indexed as

62G0562P1062R10accelerometry dataCross-fittingfunctional dataphysical activityreproducing kernel Hilbert space

Identifiers

PMID41189759
PMCPMC12581750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.