ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025
Calibrating a simulated exposure distribution using measurement error models.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indirect exposure assessment based on average environmental concentrations in microenvironments and time spent in each environment has been considered an important way of assessing personal exposure to air pollutants. Using this indirect approach, the exposure simulator generates personal exposure values or the distribution of personal exposure for air pollutants. To match the simulator with the actual exposure measurements well, some calibration is necessary. However, unlike simulators generating personal exposure values, research evaluating the validity of the second type of simulator is rare. This study aims to develop a method for calibrating a simulator that generates an exposure distribution. To describe the relationship between the actual exposure measurements and the simulator, we introduce measurement error models (MEMs) and explain how the coefficients in the models can be used for calibrating the exposure distribution. We illustrate the proposed method using a Korea Simulation Exposure Model for fine particulate matter (KoSEM-PMII).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.