ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025
New insights into multicollinearity in the Cox proportional hazard models: the Kibria-Lukman estimator and its application.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines the Cox proportional hazards model (CPHM) in the presence of multicollinearity. Typically, the maximum partial likelihood estimator (MPLE) is employed to estimate the model coefficients, which works well when the covariates are uncorrelated. However, in various scenarios, covariates are correlated, leading to unstable coefficient estimates with the MPLE. To address this challenge, Liu and ridge estimators have been introduced in the CPHMs. In this paper, we present the Kibria-Lukman estimator as an advancement over existing alternatives and explore its properties. We evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator through Monte Carlo simulations, utilizing mean squared error and mean absolute error as criteria for comparison. Additionally, we demonstrate our proposal advantages through analyzing a medical dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.