Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189754›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

A multivariate randomized response model for mixed-type data.

Amanda M Y Chu, Yasuhiro Omori, Hing-Yu So, Mike K P So

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda M Y ChuDepartment of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Yasuhiro OmoriFaculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hing-Yu SoHong Kong Academy of Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Mike K P SoDepartment of Information Systems, Business Statistics and Operations Management, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not uncommon for surveys in the social sciences to ask sensitive questions. Asking sensitive questions indirectly enables collecting of the desirable sensitive information while at the same time protecting respondents' data privacy. The randomized response technique, which uses a randomization scheme to collect sensitive responses, is one common approach used to achieve this. In this paper, we propose a multivariate ordered probit model to jointly analyze binary and ordinal sensitive response variables. We also develop Bayesian methods to estimate the probit model and perform posterior inference. The proposed probit model is applied to a large-scale drug administration survey to understand the work practice and experience of staff in three hospitals in Hong Kong. Randomized response technique was adopted in this drug administration survey to maintain the anonymity of staff whose work practice may deviate from official hospital guidelines. Empirical results using the drug administration data illustrate that we can understand the experience and practice of staff members in giving medication through probit modeling. Knowing the staff's practice on giving medication can indicate what drug administration procedures the staff may not follow properly and what areas to focus on for the enhancing of drug administration.

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisdata privacymultivariate probit modelspatient safetyrandomized response techniques

Identifiers

PMID41189754
PMCPMC12581783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.