ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2025
Finding differentially expressed genes between cell fates predicted by image-based deep learning.
Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finding early trigger genes involved in cell-fate-determining processes is important for understanding molecular mechanisms of, e.g., differentiation and disease progression. One of the powerful tools for the finding is hypothesis-free omics measurements, e.g., gene expression analysis (transcriptome analysis) by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). However, because whole single-cell RNA-seq requires cell disruption and the fate of the disrupted cell is generally unknown, it is difficult to find fate-related genes by single-cell RNA-seq profiles, especially in the early stages of cell-fate determination. Meanwhile, deep learning has successfully predicted cell fates using individual cell images. Here, we developed an approach by integrating image-based cell-fate prediction using deep learning and single-cell whole-transcriptome analysis to find differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different predicted fates. As a proof of principle, we applied this approach to cells fated to die and survive. First, we applied temporary heat stress to a mammalian cell line to induce a certain fraction of cells to die, and performed time-lapse imaging to observe this process. Second, we made image-based deep learning models trained with our dataset for the cell fate prediction (survival and death). Third, we picked the cells after another time-lapse imaging and performed single-cell RNA-seq. Finally, we compared the transcriptomes between cells predicted to die and survive. We successfully detected the DEGs when the transcriptomic profiles did not show clear multiple clusters that may correspond to the heat-induced different fates in a dimension-reduced plane. Our approach may contribute to a deeper understanding of cell-fate regulation and new molecular marker detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.