ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Influence of Training Load on the Risk of Injuries in Preprofessional Contemporary Dancers: A Scoping Review.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contemporary dance consists of blending many dance styles and exploring movements that test the physical boundaries of the human form. A preprofessional contemporary dancer can have an intense training load as a performance athlete. Despite intense training, the detailed factors influencing injury are not completely understood. Purpose: To investigate how training intensity, type, and duration can affect the incidence and severity of injury in preprofessional contemporary dancers. Study Design: Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 6 databases were searched in July 2022, yielding 226 relevant records. The search query used broad terms to capture as many studies as possible: danc* AND contemporary dance AND injury. After initial screening, 111 studies underwent abstract review, resulting in 54 being selected for full-text review. Finally, 9 studies were included in this review, and a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Results: Three themes emerged from the studies in this review. First, there was a lack of standardization in the definitions of injury across the studies. These variations affected the comprehensive assessment of the overall effect of high-level training on contemporary dancers. Second, a high incidence of overuse injuries was reported. Overuse injuries ranged from 20% to 80% of the total injuries that were reported. Third, a sudden spike in training hours during the final weeks leading up to performances resulted in a higher incidence of injuries, which yielded a statistically significant nonlinear correlation across multiple studies. This was confirmed by applying a cubic spline model on the aggregated data, which yielded results of 99.7% of the variance in injury incidence based on training load that were similarly significant ( Conclusion: Our study showed that despite the lack of standardization in defining "injury" among preprofessional dancers, an inclusive definition encompassing "all complaints" proves most accurate for reporting injury incidence among contemporary dancers, who frequently suffer from overuse injuries. Erratic training schedules-particularly rapid increases in weekly training hours-significantly contribute to heightened injury rates. These data could contribute to the development of preventive guidelines for athletes engaged in high-intensity training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.