ArticleBiomaterials translational2025
Nanoformulation-assisted early diagnosis of prostate cancer: Advances and perspectives.
Article in Biomaterials translational, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology in Prostate Cancer: PSMA-Targeted Nanoplatforms, TME-Responsive Therapy, Immunomodulation, and Clinical Translation Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers affecting men worldwide. Owing to late diagnosis, the mortality rate associated with prostate cancer remains relatively high. Traditional diagnostic methods are, in most cases, unfriendly to patients or have diagnostic lag defects. Further diagnosis requires prostate biopsy. The most common biomarker is prostate-specific antigen, which is quantified as the content of the prostate health index to describe the risk of prostate cancer. Traditional biochemical analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and lack specificity. They are also limited by the detection range, preventing high sensitivity. The exploration of novel biomarkers has identified several promising alternatives. The development of integrated nanomaterial technology provides a feasible potential method for the rapid, sensitive and non-invasive determination of these biological markers and assists in the optimisation of imaging diagnosis, which is expected to solve the current challenges in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This paper reviews the advances in the diagnostic screening and imaging of prostate cancer using nanostructure-based biofunctional sensors, probes and contrast agents such as gold nanoparticles, upconversion nanoparticles, quantum dots, and magnetic nanoparticles. It also highlights the potential of emerging paradigms in nanoarchitectonics to definitive cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.