Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Efficacy and safety of idebenone tablets in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a real-world study.

Yanqi Shao, Xinyu Zhao, Zunchun Xie, You Xie, Shunyuan Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanqi ShaoDepartment of Neurology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xinyu ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zunchun XieDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
You XieDepartment of Neurology, Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Jishou, China.
Shunyuan GuoDepartment of Neurology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and adherence of idebenone tablets in improving cognitive function among patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment in a real-world setting. Methods: This single-arm, multicenter, real-world observational study enrolled 3,755 patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment from 342 hospitals across China between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients received idebenone (30 mg three times daily) for 3 months. Cognitive function was assessed using MoCA and MMSE at baseline and months 1, 2, and 3. Treatment effectiveness was categorized as markedly effective (≥80% improvement), effective (30-79% improvement), or ineffective (<30% improvement). Results: Of the 3,755 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 10.4 years; 58.5% male), 61.8% had hypertension and 48.4% had ischemic stroke. The total effectiveness rate increased progressively from 10.9-13.0% at month 1 to 37.4-38.2% at month 3 for both MoCA and MMSE scores ( Conclusion: This real-world study suggests that three-month idebenone therapy provides meaningful improvements in cognitive function among patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment, with excellent safety and adherence profiles. However, the observational, single-arm design without a control group means that observed improvements cannot be definitively attributed to the intervention alone. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize treatment protocols.

Indexed as

cognitive functionidebenonepost-stroke cognitive impairmentreal-world studyRWS

Identifiers

PMID41189659
PMCPMC12580127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.