SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Effectiveness and applications of neurologic music therapy in motor and non-motor rehabilitation for older adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ERP-based study of the effects of music tempo on inhibitory control among male drug addicts with different levels of psychological resilience.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Potential Effects of Music on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: Translating Mechanisms to Therapy.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Gait and balance outcomes of group-based music therapy, physiotherapy, and simplified dance training in patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Drumming with BEAT: a pilot study on the impact of drum set playing on motor control and quality of life in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Rhythmic Sensory Stimulation and Music-Based Interventions in Focal Epilepsy: Clinical Evidence, Mechanistic Rationale, and Digital Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To systematically assess the current status and effectiveness of neurologic music therapy in the rehabilitation of older adults with Parkinson's disease. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted for randomized controlled trials. Studies were selected according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, and methodological quality was appraised using the RoB 2. Results: Ten RCTs involving 529 older adults with PD, published mainly between 2011 and 2022, were included. Meta-analysis showed neurologic music therapy significantly improved gait velocity (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI [0.39, 1.01], Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that NMT, especially RAS, shows moderate effects in improving gait speed and stride length, with relatively consistent support across studies. However, findings on cadence remain limited and are characterized by high heterogeneity. With respect to balance, pooled analyses indicated a possible mild benefit, but this effect was highly sensitive to specific studies and failed to remain statistically significant. Overall, therefore, the evidence for balance outcomes appears weak and somewhat inconsistent. With respect to quality of life and emotional well-being, the currently available quantitative evidence is both scarce and somewhat inconsistent. It can only suggest a potential benefit in a preliminary sense, and the conclusion is far from solid. More rigorously designed and higher-quality RCTs are urgently needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.