ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
ClinFly: an all-in-one method to translate, de-identify, and summarize medical reports in HPO format.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic medicine relies on precise phenotyping and global data sharing, particularly in the context of rare diseases. However, exchanging medical reports across language barriers remains a major challenge. Manual annotation with the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) is also prone to inconsistency and incompleteness, risking the loss of clinically relevant information and potential misdiagnoses. We present ClinFly, an open-source pipeline that automatically de-identifies, translates, and summarizes medical reports into HPO terms, in compliance with health-data privacy standards and FAIR principles. In a multicenter, prospective evaluation, we benchmarked ClinFly against physician annotation for de-identification and phenotypic summarization of 50 non-English medical reports. The method achieved a recall of 99% and precision of 77% for protected health information (PHI) de-identification. For HPO summarization, high-confidence predictions reached a recall of 49% and precision of 92%, improving to 78% recall when including low-confidence terms, with an average of 6.6 HPO terms captured per report. ClinFly enables efficient, automated de-identification of PHI and summarization in HPO format to support genomic medicine across language barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.