ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Predicting the power of informal learning opportunities on technology use of physical education teachers.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An empirical study of digital competence, technostress, and job satisfaction among college physical education teachers in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of a digital literacy scale for physical education teachers in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The unsatisfactory state of physical activity and lifestyle among schoolchildren calls for changes in physical education teacher training.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates the factors influencing the acceptance of digital technologies among physical education (PE) teachers, aiming to support the integration of contemporary digital tools into movement-based learning. Drawing on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the research explores how contextual and personal factors shape teachers' willingness and ability to use digital technologies in their professional practice. Methods: A quantitative survey was conducted with 239 physical education teachers. The collected data were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM) to identify relationships among the UTAUT constructs and additional variables, including formal and informal learning opportunities, age, and gender. Results: The analysis revealed that supportive conditions and behavioural intention equally predicted the actual use of digital technologies. Perceived usefulness and social influence significantly affected behavioural intention, whereas perceived ease of use showed no significant effect-suggesting a generally high baseline of digital literacy among the participating PE teachers. Informal learning opportunities exerted a stronger influence on performance expectancy and effort expectancy than formal learning opportunities. Age and gender were not significant predictors of technology acceptance. Discussion and Conclusion: The findings indicate that digitalisation is increasingly embedded in educational practice across demographic groups. To enhance digital technology integration in PE, stakeholders should invest in both digital infrastructure and teacher development, prioritising informal, collaborative, and practice-oriented learning environments that foster sustained technology use in movement-based education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.