Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189605›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Executive functions in university students from Chile and Ecuador: Dataset.

Carlos Ramos-Galarza, Diego D Díaz-Guerra, Marena de la C Hernández-Lugo, Mónica Bolaños-Pasquel, Yunier Broche-Pérez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos Ramos-GalarzaCentro de Investigación MIST, Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Indoamérica. Quito, Ecuador.
Diego D Díaz-GuerraPsychology Department, Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas. Villa Clara, Cuba.
Marena de la C Hernández-LugoPsychology Department, Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas. Villa Clara, Cuba.
Mónica Bolaños-PasquelCentro de Investigación MIST, Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Indoamérica. Quito, Ecuador.
Yunier Broche-PérezPrisma Behavioral Center, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive functions are high-level cognitive abilities that enable individuals to regulate their behavior and thought processes consciously. In the university setting, students must effectively utilize these functions to achieve success in both their personal and academic development. The key executive functions relevant to the university context include: the supervisory attentional system, deliberate emotional regulation, conscious monitoring of responsibilities, behavior verification for learning, task organization, conscious behavior regulation, and decision-making. This dataset comprises 1373 surveys from university students in Ecuador and Chile, aged between 17 and 33 years (M

Indexed as

Executive functionsLatin americaMonitoringUEF-1 scaleUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID41189605
PMCPMC12581618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.