ReviewDrugs in context2025
Place in therapy of key treatments for platinum-sensitive, relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with a focus on lurbinectedin: a narrative review with case studies.
Review in Drugs in context, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtually all patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop resistance to first-line platinum-based chemoimmunotherapy and experience relapse. Second-line therapy is therefore an integral part of the treatment paradigm. Methods: Evidence was reviewed for key second-line regimens recommended in major guidelines for treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive relapse (chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days), focusing on recent prospective clinical trials and post hoc analyses. Case studies of second-line lurbinectedin are presented as examples of the current management approach to platinum-sensitive relapsed SCLC. Results: Subject to the limitations of cross-trial comparisons, the evidence review allowed us to draw broad conclusions about the place in therapy of approved options for platinum-sensitive relapse. Platinum rechallenge is more effective and better tolerated than topotecan and is a reasonable second-line choice in suitable patients. Topotecan provides modest clinical benefit and has the potential to cause dose-limiting haematological toxicities. Cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine combination therapy offers no clear advantages over topotecan. Efficacy outcomes with second-line lurbinectedin are similar or better than those reported with platinum rechallenge, and lurbinectedin has a more favourable safety profile and simpler administration schedule. Second-line lurbinectedin preserves platinum rechallenge for later use and may resensitize tumour cells to platinum with potential survival advantages. Lurbinectedin safety is not affected by advanced age (≥65 years). Case studies highlight objective and durable responses to second-line lurbinectedin, along with good tolerability and quality of life. Conclusions: Available evidence supports second-line lurbinectedin as a useful alternative to platinum rechallenge, topotecan and cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.