ReviewDrugs in context2025
JAK inhibitors for the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis: a narrative review.
Review in Drugs in context, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alopecia Areata: Current and Emerging Therapies.Drugs · 2026Review
- Differentiation of Palmoplantar Psoriasis, Palmoplantar Pustulosis and Hyperkeratotic Palmoplantar Eczema Using Proteomic Analysis of Tape Strip Samples.Experimental dermatology · 2026Observational
- Case Report: Abrocitinib treatment for refractory palmoplantar pustulosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic, relapsing skin condition characterized by sterile, pruritic pustules on erythematous, thickened skin of the palms and soles. It often causes painful fissures, leading to functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Due to its limited response to conventional therapies and biologic therapies, PPP remains a therapeutic challenge. Recent findings implicate both T helper 17 (T Methods: This narrative review evaluates current evidence on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of PPP. Published studies involving tofacitinib, upadacitinib and baricitinib were identified and reviewed. Results: Clinical improvements with JAK inhibitors have been reported, particularly in cases refractory to conventional systemic therapy. Findings include reductions in the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) and improvements in patient-reported quality of life, with a low incidence of adverse effects. An ongoing trial investigating deucravacitinib reflects growing interest in this drug class. Conclusion: JAK inhibitors show promise as a novel therapeutic option for PPP, given their ability to modulate multiple inflammatory pathways. Although current evidence is limited to case series and reports, results are encouraging and warrant confirmation through well-designed clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.