ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Disease progression more than 6 years after treatment impacts overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disease progression more than 6 years after treatment impacts overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) emphasize that patients with progression of disease (POD) ≤24 months have inferior prognosis compared to patients with later POD. This population-based study assessed the impact of POD on overall survival (OS) by timing of progression and first-line treatment. A total of 1186 MCL patients diagnosed 2006-2018 were identified in the Swedish lymphoma register. POD was defined as progressive disease after first-line treatment or relapse following initial response. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), comparing all-cause mortality among patients with and without POD, were estimated with Cox regression. An illness-death model was used to quantify the impact of timing of progression on OS, conditional on the timepoint of POD/PF (progression-free). Patients were followed for up to 10 years following treatment (median 3.7 years). BR, Nordic MCL2, and R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like treatment were administered to 33%, 30%, and 14% of patients. Almost half (48%, n = 572) of patients experienced POD, with consequently higher mortality, regardless of timing and treatment (adjusted HR = 7.56, 95% CI: 6.32-9.05). Importantly, even for patients with POD after 6-10 years, mortality was more than two-fold increased (HR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.05-6.79). On the absolute scale, a survival difference persisted for progression occurring up to 9 years after primary treatment. Especially early but also late progression (well beyond the 24-month mark) has a large negative impact on survival in MCL. These results highlight the need for improved first-line, including maintenance therapies to sustain remission and optimize outcomes for MCL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.