Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189503›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2025

Naked mole-rats employ a normoxic escape behaviour that is altered by social interaction.

Pareesa Lashani, Gloria Lamontagne, Karen L Kadamani, Matthew E Pamenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pareesa LashaniDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Gloria LamontagneDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Karen L KadamaniDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew E PamenterDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4035-9555

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escape behaviours are a common response when animals encounter hypoxic environments. Confoundingly, naked mole-rats (NMRs) experience hypoxia while sleeping in crowded colony nest chambers, from which escape may not be desirable. In isolation, individual NMRs decrease physical activity to save energy in hypoxia, but this response is absent when conspecifics are present. However, whether NMRs try to escape hypoxia is unknown, as is the impact of sociality on any hypoxic escape behaviours. We predicted that individual NMRs would try to escape from hypoxic environments, but that sociality would reduce the drive to escape. We allowed individual and paired NMRs to choose between normoxia (21% O₂) or various depths of hypoxia (3%, 7% or 11% O₂) and non-invasively recorded their activity. Surprisingly, individual NMRs exhibited a novel normoxic escape behaviour and preferred severe hypoxia (3% O

Indexed as

Escape ReactionHypoxiaMole RatsSocial BehaviorSocial InteractionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleactivityhypoxia escape behaviourmetabolic rate suppressionsocialityvelocity

Identifiers

PMID41189503
PMCPMC12587052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.