Observational studyBJS open2025
Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for elective inguinal hernia repair across Europe: secondary analysis of an international cohort study.
Observational study in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare systems in Europe vary in funding, accessibility, and spending per capita, potentially influencing patient access to advanced surgical techniques. This study aimed to provide a snapshot of the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for elective inguinal hernia repair across Europe.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of an international, prospective observational study of inguinal hernia repairs conducted between 30 January and 21 May 2023. Adults undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in Europe were included in the present analysis. The four European regions according to the United Nations geoscheme (Southern, Eastern, Northern, and Western Europe) were compared. A multilevel multivariable logistic regression model was used to explore factors associated with use of minimally invasive surgery.
resultsA total of 8355 patients from 254 hospitals across 23 European countries were included: 5590 from Southern, 587 from Eastern, 1541 from Northern, and 637 from Western Europe. Most hospitals were public (88.8%) and tertiary level (49.9%). Patient and hernia characteristics were generally similar, except Western Europe reported higher rates of bilateral hernias (25.9% versus 14.1% overall). Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 26.0% of patients, 70.6% in Western, 37.9% in Northern, 46.5% in Eastern, and 15.4% in Southern Europe. Multivariable regression showed significant regional disparities. Multivariable regression also identified bilateral hernias (adjusted odds ratio 14.33 (95% confidence interval 11.76 to 17.47), surgeons with experience of ≥ 201 procedures (odds ratio 3.54, 2.75 to 4.54), and private hospitals (odds ratio 2.80, 1.03 to 7.65) as factors associated with greater use of minimally invasive surgery.
conclusionSignificant disparities in minimally invasive surgery for elective inguinal hernia repair exist across Europe. Targeted initiatives should especially prioritize Southern Europe to ensure equitable access to advanced techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.