ArticleActa orthopaedica2025
Radiostereometric analysis for evaluating inducible fracture micromotion: a scoping review.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeReliable assessment of fracture healing remains a clinical challenge as radiographs and clinical examination provide only indirect information. Inducible fracture micromotion, defined as fragment displacement under load, may offer a more direct surrogate for healing. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) can measure micromotion with high precision, but its clinical use for fracture assessment remains limited and heterogeneous. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on RSA for inducible fracture micromotion and summarize methodological approaches to guide future research.
methodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Clinical studies applying RSA to assess inducible fracture micromotion were eligible. 2 reviewers independently screened and extracted data on study design, patient population, fracture location, loading protocols, thresholds for motion, and outcomes.
results7 clinical studies were included, comprising feasibility studies, prospective cohorts, and 1 imaging study. Sample sizes ranged from 6 to 16 patients, with fractures of the distal radius, femur, proximal tibia, and pelvis. All studies required intraoperative implantation of tantalum markers. Most applied differentially loaded RSA, typically comparing unloaded and loaded conditions using weightbearing platforms, force plates, or voluntary grip dynamometry. Despite varied protocols and small, single-center designs, RSA consistently detected small-scale inducible motion and, in some studies, distinguished union from non-union.
conclusionThis scoping review identified 7 clinical studies using RSA to assess inducible fracture micromotion, with heterogeneous methods across fracture types. These findings may guide the development of standardized approaches and support future research on RSA in fracture healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.