ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
Goal-directed modulation of neural activity during working memory maintenance.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual working memory is crucial for goal-directed thoughts and behaviors. However, it is not clear how goals modulate working memory maintenance, as previous models often considered stimulus encoding to be the endpoint of goal-directed control. To address this gap, eighty adults performed delayed estimation tasks while their brain activity was recorded using electroencephalography. In each trial, participants memorized three visual gratings varying in orientation and location and were instructed which attribute to recall. Based on recall success, trials were classified as successful or unsuccessful. We examined the effects of task instructions and their behavioral relevance using event-related potentials and multivariate pattern analysis during encoding and maintenance. The orientation task elicited larger contralateral delay activity than the location task. Moreover, the two tasks were decodable from brain patterns during the maintenance phase, and these patterns did not generalize to the encoding phase, suggesting that goal-directed modulation during maintenance was not merely a consequence of selective encoding. We further found that goal-directed modulation involves two functionally distinct processes that unfold dynamically over time, with the latter beginning even before stimulus offset and continuing throughout the entire maintenance phase. Finally, task decoding accuracy was consistently higher for successful than unsuccessful trials during maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.