Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189417›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025

Temporal dynamics of somatosensory gating and facilitation in the primary somatosensory cortex during finger movements.

Toshiaki Wasaka, Tetsuo Kida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toshiaki WasakaDepartment of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9203-7924
Tetsuo KidaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, 38 Nishigonaka, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3499-0762

Funding

Cooperative Study Program of National Institute for Physiological SciencesJSPS KAKENHI 25K14739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dexterous manual movements require accurate sensorimotor integration; however, understanding how the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) dynamically processes incoming afferent information during such tasks remains limited. Using magnetoencephalography, we investigated somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during two types of finger movement, varying in speed and force exertion. We focused on three SI components-M20, M30, and M38-occurring within 20 to 40 ms post-stimulation. Across all movement conditions, the M20 and M30 amplitudes were significantly reduced when compared with the stationary condition, reflecting sensory gating, whereas M38 was significantly enhanced during both the rotation and pinch tasks. Further analyses revealed that the reduction in M20 was sensitive to movement speed, and that of M30 was influenced by both speed and force. In contrast, the enhancement of M38 was modulated by the finger movement type. These findings suggest that SI activity is not uniformly inhibited during movement, but selectively modulated in a context-dependent manner. The initial components in the SI may reflect the filtering of predictable inputs, whereas M38 could represent the more complex integration associated with skillful finger movement. Thus, our results suggest a dynamic somatosensory processing mechanism that underpins fine motor control.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFingersSensory GatingSomatosensory CortexAdultFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMovementPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultdexteritygatingmanual movementsomatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Identifiers

PMID41189417
PMCPMC12586327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.