ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2026
Back to Basics: A Curriculum to Address the Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia Workforce Crisis.
Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of pediatric cardiac anesthesia faces a critical workforce shortage. Survival of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) has improved dramatically, increasing both lifetime procedural demand and case complexity. At the same time, the supply of fellowship-trained pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists is shrinking due to an aging workforce, declining fellowship recruitment, financial disincentives, and concerns about work-life balance and professional culture. The resulting mismatch between demand and supply threatens access to care and risks moral injury and attrition within the specialty. At our institution, workforce pressures necessitated the redistribution of some CHD care to general pediatric anesthesiologists through the Special Cardiac Care Anesthesia (SCCA) model. As this team expanded, members themselves recognized a pressing need for structured education in congenital cardiac physiology and anesthetic implications. In response, the Cardiac Basics curriculum was developed to provide accessible, foundational cardiac content for anesthesiologists, fellows, advanced practice providers, and intensivists. The program was designed with three goals: (1) to provide essential cardiac knowledge, (2) to deliver material in a format accessible to diverse learners, and (3) to foster a psychologically safe environment where all participants could ask questions and engage openly. The curriculum uses weekly topic guides, brief interactive didactic sessions, and case-based reinforcement. It has been well received, with strong participation across learner groups and overwhelmingly positive feedback highlighting clarity, brevity, and clinical applicability. Educational innovations such as Cardiac Basics represent a pragmatic and scalable strategy to address the pediatric cardiac anesthesia workforce crisis. By equipping a broader group of providers with the skills to care safely for selected CHD patients, such curricula can serve as a critical "force multiplier" while longer term solutions-fellowship recruitment, pipeline repair, and cultural change-are pursued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.