ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Early Higher Plasma Regorafenib Concentration Predicts Shorter PFS in Japanese Patients With mCRC.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Higher Plasma Regorafenib Concentration Predicts Shorter PFS in Japanese Patients With mCRC.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of regorafenib and its active metabolites, M2 and M5, vary widely among individual patients. However, the relationship between these plasma concentrations and therapeutic efficacy remains unclear. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving regorafenib as third-line or later treatment were enrolled. The initial dose was 120 mg daily for 1 week, then adjusted based on tolerability in a 21-day on, 7-day off cycle. Blood samples were collected on Cycle 1 Day 7, and Ctrough levels of total regorafenib, M2, and M5 were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Thirty-three patients were enrolled, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 70 days. The median Ctrough level of regorafenib, M2, and M5 was 2146.9 ng/mL (range: 369.0-5445.9), 1587.2 ng/mL (range: 43.6-6762.7), and 582.9 ng/mL (range: 39.9-352.6), respectively. There was an inverse correlation between PFS and the Ctrough level of regorafenib (r = -0.394, p = 0.023). Patients with regorafenib levels ≥ 2848.4 ng/mL had significantly shorter PFS (median 35 vs. 95 days, HR 3.23, 95% CI 1.45-7.25, p = 0.002). In Cycle 1, more frequent serious adverse events (30.0% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.073) and an increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (median: 3.9 (3.0-5.2) vs. 3.1 (1.1-14.5), p = 0.031) were observed in the higher group. Furthermore, the rate of treatment resumption after interruption during Cycle 1 was significantly lower in the higher group (16.7% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.003). A rapid increase in blood concentrations of regorafenib early after administration resulted in severe toxicity and systemic inflammation, which may have subsequently contributed to shorter PFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.