ArticleInternational journal of nursing practice2025
The Quality in Psychiatric Care-Outpatient Staff Instrument: Psychometric Evaluation and Staff Views on Quality of Care.
Article in International journal of nursing practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Quality in Psychiatric Care-Outpatient Staff Instrument: Psychometric Evaluation and Staff Views on Quality of Care.International journal of nursing practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structure of the Quality in Psychiatric Care-Outpatient Staff (QPC-OPS) instrument and briefly describe the staff's views on the quality of care provided in general outpatient clinics as well as demographic and clinical factors associated with quality of care.
methodThe study employed a cross-sectional design to conduct a psychometric evaluation and survey of staff perspectives. A sample of 143 permanently employed members of staff in multiprofessional teams at 15 outpatient clinics in Sweden completed the QPC-OPS, which consists of 30 items covering eight dimensions of quality of care.
resultsThe QPC-OPS exhibited excellent psychometric properties, with a total alpha coefficient of 0.94, a test-retest reliability of 0.96 and a goodness-of-fit measure for the proposed model with a RMSEA value of 0.048. The staff's rating was generally high. Ratings were highest for Encounter and lowest for Accessibility. Staff who rated their own mental health as higher rated quality of care higher in most of the dimensions.
conclusionThe Swedish QPC-OPS showed excellent psychometric properties and is a useful, inexpensive and simple way to evaluate the quality of care in outpatient care and contributes to health care improvement in the field of psychiatric care. The low quality of the dimension of Accessibility indicates an important area for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.