ReviewImmunological reviews2025
Extrafollicular B Cell Responses-Is One Tent Big Enough?
Review in Immunological reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mostly getting along -Borrelia burgdorferi and its manipulation of the host immune system.ImmunoHorizons · 2026Review
- Reversing pregnancy-induced B cell sensitization to facilitate the induction of transplant tolerance in postpartum recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026Article
- Germinal-centre and extrafollicular B cell pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Harnessing MSCs plasticity: mechanisms and determinants of bidirectional immune regulation in stem-cell-based immunotherapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- B cell-mediated immune reconstitution after lung transplantation: mechanisms, interventions, and prognostic evaluation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Initial description of extrafollicular B cell responses (EF) identified them as short-lived clusters of rapidly proliferating B cells and plasmablasts in splenic bridging channels and red pulp as well as lymph node medullary cord areas. Their physical location guided the nomenclature: outside, or at the edges of B cell follicles and near T cell zones of secondary lymphoid organs, thus distinct from the follicular situated germinal centers (GCs). Because EFs are often induced transiently and to both T-dependent and T-independent antigens, and because they generate IgM and class-switched antibodies often with no or little signs of somatic hypermutations, they were thought to be less impactful than GC-derived antibodies. However, highly protective antibodies are generated by these EFs rapidly after acute infections and their induction often correlates with pathogen clearance, while in autoimmunity EF-derived antibodies have been implicated as pathogenic drivers of disease. Moreover, subsets of memory B cells, including some CD11c+ "atypical" B cells/ABCs are generated independently of GC. Their diverse appearance and impact have initiated an ongoing debate about whether all "non-GC responses" are necessarily EF responses. The current debate is reflected also in the articles compiled for this issue of Immunological Reviews considering EF responses. Here, I briefly summarize the steps leading to B cell activation and EF and GC formation, providing context for the contributed reviews that span a breadth of topics from descriptions of non-GC responses in jawed non-mammalian vertebrates as possible orthologues of mammalian EF to the molecular and metabolic requirements and CD4 T cell helper quality of EF, tissue-specific B cell responses, and discussions on the origins and classifications of "atypical" memory B cells in mice and man.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.