ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Predicting diet quality and food consumption at eating occasions using contextual factors: an application of machine learning models.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Malnutrition in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating occasions (EOs) are important moments for dietary decision-making. Tailoring nutrition interventions to individuals’ behaviours and environmental contexts offers a promising way to modify eating habits at EOs and enhance diet quality. While machine learning (ML) is a useful tool for predicting behaviours, its potential in understanding food choices at EOs remains underexplored. This study uses ML to investigate whether contextual factors can predict food consumption at EOs and overall daily diet quality.
methodsCross-sectional data from the Measuring Eating in Everyday Life Study (MEALS) were analysed. Participants (18-30y, n = 675) recorded intakes for 3–4 non-consecutive days using a Smartphone food diary app. EO-level contextual factors at each EO were recorded via the app while person-level contextual factors were collected via an online survey. Intakes were calculated as servings of vegetables, fruits, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary foods, in accordance with the Australian Dietary Guideline. Diet quality was assessed via Dietary Guideline Index (DGI, 0-120). Gradient boost decision tree and random forest algorithms were used for hurdle prediction models, with lowest mean absolute error (MAE) as best performing. Mean absolute SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the impact of each factor in explaining food consumption predictions.
resultsPredictive models performed robustly, with MAE below half a serving for various food groups: 0.3 servings for vegetables, 0.75 for fruit, 0.28 for dairy, 0.55 for grains, 0.4 for meat, and 0.68 for discretionary foods per EO. This indicates small deviations between the model’s predictions and actual intakes. For overall daily diet quality, the model predictions deviated by 11.86 DGI points from the actual score. From mean absolute SHAP values, the importance of predictive factors varied across the six food groups, while for diet quality, the most influential factors were cooking confidence, self-efficacy, food availability, perceived time scarcity, and activity during consumption.
conclusionML provided valuable insights into predicting food consumption based on contextual factors. Future research should explore how ML can assist identify key factors that, when adjusted for individual behaviour patterns, encourage healthier eating habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.