ArticlePlant methods2025
Development of a unified deep learning approach integrating CNN-based local and ViT-based global feature extraction for enhanced cotton disease and pest classification.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TriAttnNet based deep learning model for automated cotton pest detection and disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SpatioFormer: spatial perception enhancement for lightweight agricultural pest and disease detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A paradigm-level evaluation of deep learning architectures for plant pest and disease recognition under data-scarce field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cotton diseases and pests pose significant threats to cotton production, necessitating accurate and efficient classification methods. Despite existing advanced methods, there is a research gap in utilizing both local feature extraction and global context capture for enhanced classification accuracy. Hence, this study developed and evaluated three advanced models for cotton disease and pest classification: a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model, a Vision Transformer (ViT)-based model, and a hybrid CNN-ViT model. These models were trained on a dataset comprising eight classes of cotton diseases and pests, namely aphids, armyworm, bacterial blight, cotton boll rot, green cotton boll, healthy, powdery mildew, and target spot. The results demonstrated that the hybrid CNN-ViT model achieved the highest overall performance with an average test accuracy of 98.5%. The CNN model showed strong performance with an average accuracy of 97.9%. The ViT models, while having self-attention mechanisms to capture context and dependencies, exhibited improved performance with increased depth. The ViT model having four transformer layers outperformed the two-layer variant, achieving an average accuracy of 97.2% compared to 96.3%. The hybrid model effectively combined the strengths of CNN's local feature extraction and ViT's global feature capture, resulting in superior classification accuracy across most classes. Future research should focus on expanding the dataset to include more diverse diseases and pests and integrating the models with autonomous platforms for spraying the chemicals, thus facilitating real-world adoption and application in agricultural settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.