Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188899›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Developing and validating an evidence-based health promotion program for reproductive donors reflecting their challenges in the process of donation decision-making: a multi-method study protocol.

Elnaz Iranifard, Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami, Hossein Ebrahimipour, Malihe Amirian, Helen T Allan, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elnaz IranifardMashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1332-9094
Samira Ebrahimzadeh ZagamiNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-8904
Hossein EbrahimipourDepartment of Health Economics and Management, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-372X
Malihe AmirianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fellowship of Infertility, School of Medicine, Infertility Center of Mashhad, University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-3687
Helen T AllanEmerita Professor of Nursing, England, Great Britain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9391-0385
Robab Latifnejad RoudsariNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. latifnejadr@mums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-8822

Funding

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 4010131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demand for reproductive donation has increased globally. Donors face various challenges, which make decision-making difficult for them and may impact their health and quality of life. It seems that there is no ongoing, holistic healthcare program for reproductive donors in the fertility clinics. To fill this knowledge gap, the current study explores Iranian reproductive donors' challenges in the process of donation decision-making to incorporate the findings in developing and validating a needs-based and evidence-based health promotion program.

methodsThis multi-method study will be conducted in three stages. Stage one will employ a qualitative design based on grounded theory methodology to conduct interviews with participants, including embryo, oocyte, and sperm donors, as well as other key informants such as gynecologists, urologists, midwives, psychologists, and donors' family members, across three cities in Iran. Using purposeful and theoretical sampling, data will be collected by face-to-face, in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed by the constant comparison method adopted by Corbin and Strauss. Stage two will focus on planning a health promotion program, incorporating qualitative data collected in stage one into the stages of program planning. The program planning will be based on the six steps of the Public Health Ontario model. In the third stage, the program will be validated by the nominal group technique. DISCUSSION: The theoretical framework generated at the first stage will demonstrate reproductive donors' concerns regarding donation decision-making, the context in which they make their decisions, the strategies they adopt to respond to their issues, and their consequences. It will demonstrate conditions that facilitate or hinder donors' decision-making. The findings of this stage will inform the development of a health promotion program, which will be evidence-based and tailored to the needs of reproductive donors and the sociocultural context in which they undergo the donation process. This program, subject to validation by experts, could be adopted by fertility centers to enhance reproductive donors' health and quality of life. The findings of this study can be used as a basis for further relevant research.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth PromotionOocyte DonationTissue DonorsFemaleHumansIranMaleQualitative ResearchDonor conceptionGrounded theoryHealth promotionOvum donorSemen donor

Identifiers

PMID41188899
PMCPMC12584286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.