ArticleVirology journal2025
Development of broadly neutralizing antibodies against Omicron variants from existing neutralizing antibodies in clinical trials.
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05162365 (A Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Study of IBI314 in Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Study of IBI314 in Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of new SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains has made it extremely difficult to create broadly neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) with assured therapeutic potential. Currently approved neutralizing antibodies have displayed substantially decreased or abolished efficacy against emerging Omicron variants including XBB and BQ.1 Due to the potential of reinfection from new emerging VOCs, this emphasizes the urgent need for developing widely active mAbs that offer preventive and therapeutic advantages to high-risk patients. Here, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of redirecting existing mAbs which are in late-stage development in clinical trials against new variants of SARS-CoV-2.
methodsIn vitro affinity maturation libraries against BA.2 RBD were constructed based on neutralizing antibodies P5-22 and P14-44 developed by Innovent Biologics as components of IBI314 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05162365). Yeast surface display and flow cytometry sorting were utilized to screen antibodies with improved affinity. The selected antibodies were characterized by binding kinetics analysis. Their neutralization potency against SARS-CoV-2 variants was evaluated by pseudovirus neutralization assay and focus reduction neutralization test. Bispecific antibodies were designed in different formats using affinitymatured Fabs. The prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of antibodies were examined in hACE2 transgenic mice infected with BA.2.3.
resultsBy in vitro affinity maturation of two nAb P5-22 and P14-44, we obtained antibodies broadly neutralizing pre-Omicron strains and BA.1/BA.2 variants. A bispecific 2 + 2 antibody showed further neutralization potency against BA.4/BA.5 even XBB and BQ1.1. These bispecific antibodies showed potent therapeutic and prophylactic potency in authentic Omicron virus challenge in mouse models in vivo.
conclusionsTogether, our approach revealed the possibility of engineering of existing antibodies to broad-spectrum mAbs as potential therapeutic or prophylactic agents for COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.