ArticleMalaria journal2025
Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria prevention and determinants of antenatal care utilization among pregnant women in Sekyere South district, Ghana; a cross-sectional study.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria in pregnancy contributes significantly to poor maternal health outcomes, accounting for 17.6% of outpatient visits in Ghana. The Ashanti Region, particularly Sekyere South District, bears a high burden despite interventions, such as ITN distribution and intensified IPTp education. Limited evidence exists on how pregnant women's knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) influence preventive behaviours and ANC use in this setting.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 422 pregnant women using structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were applied to assess predictors of malaria prevention behaviours and ANC attendance.
resultsMost respondents (78%) had adequate knowledge, though misconceptions persisted (56% believed malaria could spread person-to-person). Only 48% knew the recommended ≥ 3 IPTp doses, and ITN use was 63%, with non-use linked to heat discomfort and unavailability. Knowledge of IPTp dosage was significantly associated with uptake (p < 0.001), but socio-demographic factors were not predictors of ANC attendance.
conclusionGaps in malaria prevention stem from misconceptions, incomplete IPTp adherence, and inconsistent ITN use rather than supply shortages. Priorities include strengthening ANC counselling, correcting myths, introducing reminder prompts, and expanding outreach with ITN replacement. Enhancing implementation fidelity is critical to improving maternal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.