ReviewGenome medicine2025
Genome instability and crosstalk with the immune response.
Review in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative DNA Damage Is Associated with Immune Remodeling and Therapeutic Response in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Cancer stem cells and drug resistance in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Unraveling the link between genomic instability and tumor immune evasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Role of CBMN assay and emerging perspectives.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Fanconi Anemia as a Window into Premalignant Field Cancerization of the Oral Mucosa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- RETRACTED: Endogenous Retroviruses as Regulators of Innate Immune Signaling and InflammationViruses · 2026Review
- The DDR-immune fitness score: a biomarker for guiding parp and immunotherapy synergy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome instability, tumour-promoting inflammation, and immune escape are three distinct hallmarks of cancer. However, accumulating scientific and clinical evidence over the past decade have uncovered a multifaceted interplay of complex dynamic network of interactions between genome instability, the DNA damage response (DDR), and tumour immunogenicity. Fuelled by the clinical successes of immune checkpoint blockers (ICB), growing interest for immuno-oncology and recent cancer biology discoveries have allowed a better understanding of the underlying biology and clinical opportunities brought by this interplay-which is yet, still only in its infancy. The cooperative nature of tumour cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms involved suggests that harnessing genomic instability in cancer does not only hamper cancer cells fitness but also stimulate the anti-tumour immune response, thereby paving the way to the development of DDR-based immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies applicable to a variety of molecular and histological cancer types. Here, we review the various aspects of this crosstalk between genome instability and tumour immunogenicity, including feedforward and feedback mechanisms affecting either side of this interplay, as well as the specific consequences of chromosomal instability. We further discuss emerging DDR-based predictive biomarkers of response to ICB therapies, and finally examine the latest clinical developments of therapeutic combinations that exploit the DDR-immunity interplay in immuno-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.