ArticleBMC medical education2025
Enhancing skill development in the medical kitchen: an in-depth exploration through the experiences of undergraduate medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Medical Kitchen course was developed to facilitate the transition of second-year medical students from theoretical learning to clinical placements by integrating practical skill training within a transdisciplinary approach. This study explored two research questions: how students perceived their technical and nontechnical skill development during the course, and which course features could be optimized to better support this development.
methodsThirteen medical students who attended the course participated in three focus group discussions. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes related to skill development.
resultsSix sub-themes emerged from the analysis, categorized under two main themes: technical and nontechnical skill development. Participants reported that the course significantly enhanced their technical skills, particularly in suturing, through hands-on activities and a supportive learning environment. They highlighted the importance of continuous practice to achieve proficiency. The group setting facilitated collaborative learning and recognition of diverse learning styles. Additionally, the course helped students recognize the significance of nontechnical skills, which they had previously overlooked, emphasizing their relevance for future clinical practice. While participants expressed a desire for more explicit instruction and structured opportunities to develop both technical and nontechnical skills, they recognized the value of these competencies and their impact on future professional development.
conclusionFrom the students' perspectives, the Medical Kitchen course provided valuable opportunities to develop technical skill while also enhancing awareness of the importance of nontechnical skills in clinical practice. Further course refinements could optimize skill acquisition by offering clearer explanation of the transdisciplinary approach and incorporating additional structured learning elements and practice opportunities, thereby better supporting students' transition to clinical placements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.