ArticleBMC oral health2025
Domiciliary denture treatment for edentulous older adults: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTooth loss increases with age, placing a greater burden on older adults. While the demand for domiciliary dental services is growing, its implementation and efficacy remain underexplored. This study aims to examine the procedures and evaluate the effectiveness of domiciliary denture treatment for edentulous older adults, providing valuable insights for future practice.
methodsNineteen edentulous patients who received domiciliary denture treatment between February 2021 and April 2022 were included. Patient satisfaction with new dentures was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and nutritional status were evaluated before and after denture delivery using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), respectively. Masticatory performance was measured via a two-colored chewing gum test. Facial contour changes were recorded using three-dimensional facial scanning technology.
resultsAt the 3-month post-denture delivery assessment, OHRQoL showed a significant improvement (p = 0.002) and remained stable throughout the 12-month follow-up period, aligning with high patient satisfaction. Nutritional status also improved marginally following rehabilitation, though the change was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Masticatory performance saw a significant enhancement (p = 0.039). In terms of facial contour, significant post-rehabilitation increases were observed in the lower third facial height (Sn-Gn; Sn-Pg), upper lip height (Sn-Ls), mouth width (ChR-ChL), and lower facial convexity (Sn-St-Pg) (p < 0.05). Conversely, facial convexity excluding the nasal component (N-Sn-Pg) decreased significantly (p = 0.029).
conclusionDomiciliary denture services provide a clinically effective and convenient healthcare model for homebound edentulous older adults. Despite its limitations, this study’s preliminary findings indicate that this approach improves masticatory performance and facial harmony, thereby enhancing nutritional status and yielding significant gains in quality of life, meriting inclusion in public health programs for ageing populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.