Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188851›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025

Best microbiological practice recommendations for the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infections: the CRIOGO bacteriology reference center network.

Pascale Bémer, Chloé Plouzeau-Jayle, Carole Lemarié, Didier Tande, Anne Gougeon-Jolivet, Rachel Chenouard, Claudie Lamoureux, Sophie Reissier, Louise Ruffier d'Epenoux, Laura Chaufour and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. How long should we keep clinical isolates involved in bone and joint infections in microbiology laboratories?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pascale BémerService de Bactériologie et des Contrôles Microbiologiques, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Chloé Plouzeau-JayleService de Bactériologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Carole LemariéService de Bactériologie, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Didier TandeUnité de Bactériologie, Pôle de Biologie-Pathologie, CHU Brest, Brest, France.
Anne Gougeon-JolivetService de Bactériologie, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Rachel ChenouardService de Bactériologie, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Claudie LamoureuxUnité de Bactériologie, Pôle de Biologie-Pathologie, CHU Brest, Brest, France.
Sophie ReissierService de Bactériologie, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Louise Ruffier d'EpenouxService de Bactériologie et des Contrôles Microbiologiques, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Laura ChaufourService de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, CHU Tours, Tours, France.
Marie-Frédérique LartigueService de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, CHU Tours, Tours, France.
Stéphane CorvecService de Bactériologie et des Contrôles Microbiologiques, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France. stephane.corvec@chu-nantes.fr.
on behalf the CRIOGO study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of prosthetic Joint Infections (PJI) remains challenging at the microbiological level. Despite the implementation and adoption of new methods, an heterogeniety of microbiological practices is still observed. These CRIOGO recommendations (Centre de Référence des Infections Ostéo-articulaires du Grand Ouest) aim to set out some basic principles for the diagnosis of PJI in microbiology laboratories. The CRIOGO microbiologists' team who have been working together for 15 years were invited to provide regional recommendations for microbiology diagnosis based on their practical expertise. These recommendations were developed through a systematic review of the literature and discussion amongst experts. The proposed CRIOGO recommendations were voted on upon by a 10 local panelists via the Delphi process. Total consensus was reached on all 27 recommendations that received 100% agreement. The CRIOGO microbiologists' team proposed practical guidelines in response to the most frequently asked questions received at our laboratory reference centres. A short, comprehensive answer supported by literature backs up the argument. Out of the 27 detailed CRIOGO recommendations, 22 achieved 100% consensus. This work was initiated to harmonise our daily practices for managing PJI diagnosis within the CRIOGO network in line with the literature.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumans

Identifiers

PMID41188851
PMCPMC12584468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.