ArticleBMC health services research2025
Reimagining grommet follow-up care: audiology-led outcomes and cost comparison with ENT (Ear, Nose and Throat) and nurse-led models.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrommet insertion is one of the most common surgeries in childhood. While post-operative care has been traditionally provided by Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) specialists, workforce capacity challenges have led to the delegation of care to alternate workforces, including audiology. This study aims to evaluate safety and effectiveness of audiology-led post-grommet services and to compare costs of audiology-led models with traditional medical and simulated nurse-led models.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in a regional New Zealand public hospital including all 247 children attending an audiology-led post-grommet clinic from 2019 to 2025. Patient outcomes and pathways through post-grommet services were mapped and costs to the healthcare system and patient/families were calculated.
results42.5% of children required an ENT assessment following the implementation of an audiology-led post-grommet model. At the first post-operative visit (median 184 days) 57.5% of grommets were nonfunctional. There were no adverse events reported over the six-year study period. Average healthcare system cost per patient was $NZ130.40 for the audiology-led model representing a 12% cost-savings compared to the standard ENT model ($NZ147.85). The simulated nurse-led model was more costly compared to the audiology-led and ENT models. Cost-savings for patients were achieved through salary differences and fewer clinic visits required under the audiology-led model compared to standard care.
conclusionsAudiology-led post-grommet models are a clinically appropriate and cost-efficient approach to optimise service delivery in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.