Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188838›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Development and validation of a multidimensional and interpretable artificial intelligence model to predict gout recurrence in hospitalised patients: a real-world, ambispective multicentre cohort study in China.

Meng Li, Hui Zhang, Shixian Chen, Fei Zhong, Jiani Liu, Juan Wu, Ruifeng Lin, Ruichang Li, Yu Wu, Danning Xie and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Meng Li *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Hui Zhang *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Shixian Chen *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Fei Zhong *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Jiani LiuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Juan WuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Ruifeng LinDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Ruichang LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Taishan People's Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Yu WuDongguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Danning XieDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Kangyu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bowen ZhengDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoling ChenThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhipeng ChengThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yinxiu JiangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Haixin YeDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Li CaiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Ruixia XieDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Dongsheng Li *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Junqing Zhu *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Juan Li *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. lijuan@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Province Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No.2021A1515220039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGout is the most common inflammatory arthritis. Recurrent flares are common among hospitalised patients and contribute to substantial clinical and economic burden. However, the accurate prediction of inpatient recurrence remains challenging, particularly in individuals with comorbid gout. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of variables and develop a multidimensional, interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict gout recurrence (GoutRe).

methodsWe conducted a real-world, retrospective, prospective, multicentre cohort study across five tertiary hospitals in China (2010-2024), enrolling 6,526 hospitalised patients with comorbid gout. A total of 82 multidimensional features encompassing laboratory findings, comorbidities, medications, and clinical indicators were collected. We developed 3,744 AI models and the optimal model was chosen based on practicality and performance. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was used for feature importance analysis and interpret the model. Subgroup and stratified analyses were performed by age, tophus, comorbidities, and key biomarkers such as serum urate (SU), neutrophil count (NEUT), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

resultsThe final GoutRe model achieved strong discrimination across all cohorts, with AUCs of 0.832 (training, 95%CI 0.820-0.845), 0.785 (internal validation, 95%CI 0.763-0.808), 0.742 (external validation, 95%CI 0.690-0.793), and 0.744 (prospective validation, 95%CI 0.673-0.814). Calibration plots and low Brier scores indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Decision curve analysis demonstrated favorable net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified 20 key predictors, including length of stay, glucocorticoid use, SU, neutrophil count, and tophus. The model showed enhanced performance in patients aged ≥60 years, those with tophus, and in subgroups with neoplasms, genitourinary, neurological, and cardiovascular diseases. Stratified analyses revealed significant positive correlations between recurrence risk and elevated SU, NEUT, and reduced eGFR. A secure web-based application was developed for clinical implementation.

conclusionsThe multidimensional and interpretable GoutRe model demonstrated robust predictive performance across diverse clinical settings and validation cohorts. Its web-based tool may assist clinicians in early identification of patients at high risk of GoutRe, thereby enabling individualized treatment planning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGoutAdultAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceGoutInterpretablePrediction modelRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41188838
PMCPMC12584441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.