Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188827›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Levelling-up summer: using summer holiday programs to support child health and wellbeing - a Delphi study.

Emily Eglitis, Timothy Olds, Rosa Virgara, Amanda Machell, Mandy Richardson, Kylie Brannelly, Carol Maher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily EglitisAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. emily.eglitis@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Timothy OldsAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Rosa VirgaraAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Amanda MachellAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Mandy RichardsonDepartment for Education, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Kylie BrannellyNational Outside School Hours Services Alliance, 66 Woodend Road, Woodend, QLD, 4306, Australia.
Carol MaherAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Funding

Investigator Grant from the Medical Research Future Fund MRF1193862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren's health behaviours tend to worsen during the summer holidays, with declines in physical activity, diet, sleep, and mental wellbeing. Structured summer holiday programs may help counter these trends, while also supporting families and reducing inequalities. The purpose of this study was to establish the interest, perceived importance, and key preferences for structured summer programming in Australia and explore potential delivery models with an emphasis on sustainability, scalability and supporting families living on low incomes.

methodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted between November 2024 and April 2025. The Delphi panel consisted of stakeholders from government, extended care, research, education and parenting backgrounds. Round 1 explored perceived importance, barriers, and facilitators; Round 2 examined program features, and delivery and funding models; and Round 3 focused on priorities to improve access for families living on low incomes. Consensus was set a priori at 80%.

resultsSixty stakeholders agreed to participate, with an average response rate of 65%. There was consensus that summer programming is important for children's physical and mental health, and social skills. Program cost, access (availability, transport) and awareness were identified as key barriers to participation. Participants agreed that programs should run for the entire working day and offer accessible, inclusive, enrichment-focused activities. For families on low incomes, providing meals and snacks was viewed as essential. A daily family contribution of $1-$10 was considered acceptable to encourage attendance and perceived value. There was no single preferred delivery model, stakeholders emphasised the need for flexible, locally adapted approaches that build on existing community infrastructure and partnerships. Top barriers to national scale-up included lack of sustainable government funding, high operational costs, and workforce shortages. The most popular angles for advocacy were supporting children's socio-emotional and mental wellbeing, and positive ways to spend time.

conclusionThere is clear stakeholder support for expanding structured summer holiday programming in Australia, particularly to benefit children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Programs have the potential to promote health, wellbeing, and equity, but realising this will require government investment, local partnerships, and delivery models that reflect community needs. These findings may inform similar efforts in other countries where summer programs are not equitably available.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth PromotionHolidaysSeasonsAdultAustraliaChildDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMalePovertyChild healthObesitySummer holiday programs

Identifiers

PMID41188827
PMCPMC12584409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.