ArticleBMC nursing2025
Attitudes and experiences of nurses and carers with the carer support needs assessment tool intervention (CSNAT-I).
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study explores the perspectives of nurses and informal carers regarding the implementation and use of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) in palliative cancer care.
backgroundCarers play a crucial role in supporting patients with serious illnesses, yet their own support needs often remain unmet. The CSNAT-I was developed to systematically assess, address, and follow up on the needs of carers, aiming to enhance support for them.
methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with three oncology nurses (via telephone with detailed field notes) and one focus group with four palliative-care nurses, alongside five carer interviews. Data were collected between January and March 2021, with all carer interviews and the focus group audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using content analysis, and the study adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines.
resultsAlthough nurses acknowledged the importance of supporting carers, the integration of CSNAT-I was hindered by time constraints, unclear implementation processes, and limited understanding of its purpose. Both nurses and carers preferred ongoing dialogue and relational continuity over structured assessments. The CSNAT-I was often perceived as a conversation starter rather than a tool to guide support systematically. While some carers received practical help after the assessment conversation, they did not necessarily associate this support with the CSNAT-I.
conclusionThe study highlights key challenges with the CSNAT-I, such as issues related to timing, workload pressures, and limited awareness of its intended purpose. Carers emphasised the importance of continuous support and consistent contact points with healthcare professionals rather than relying solely on structured assessments. While CSNAT-I appears to play a valuable role in legitimising time spent with carers, its full potential is likely to be realised better if it is embedded within person-centred pathways that include clear strategies for implementation and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.