Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188786›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Evaluating chikungunya outbreak size and emergency vaccination strategies in Miami: an exploratory modeling study.

A M de Roo, M Boer, G T Vondeling, T Louwsma, A C Sloof, M J Postma, C N Mores, R C Christofferson, J van der Schans, L A de Jong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A M de RooUnit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.m.de.roo@rug.nl.
M BoerAsc Academics B.V, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G T VondelingValneva Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
T LouwsmaAsc Academics B.V, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A C SloofAsc Academics B.V, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M J PostmaUnit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
C N MoresDepartment of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
R C ChristoffersonDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803, USA.
J van der SchansUnit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
L A de JongUnit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of vector-borne diseases such as chikungunya - caused by the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes - is increasing as globalization and climate change continue to expand the habitat of its primary vectors. In 2024 alone, nearly 500,000 chikungunya cases were reported worldwide. Miami-Dade County, Florida, is particularly vulnerable due to the endemic presence of Aedes aegypti and its role as a major entry point for international travel and trade. This study explores the possible impact of a CHIKV outbreak in urban Miami and the effectiveness of an emergency response vaccination program as a preventive measure.

methodsWe created a dynamic vector-host model with a SEIR-SEI structure including local temperature and demographic data. To capture uncertainty, we defined multiple scenarios with varying vector-host ratios (VHRs) and vaccination coverage levels. Emergency vaccination was modeled as an outbreak response strategy to explore its potential impact on outbreak size.

resultsOur scenario-based analysis showed that CHIKV transmission in Miami can happen year-round, with peak outbreak potential from May to August. Outbreak likelihood strongly depended on the VHR, ranging from an annual average of 5% (VHR of 0.75) to 21% (VHR of 2). The VHR also had a major impact on outbreak size, with a median of 224 cases (IQR: 50-740) at a VHR of 1, and 21,053 cases (IQR: 8,900-36,990) at a VHR of 1.5. Outbreak response vaccination reduced outbreak size by a median of 19% (IQR: 2.5%-38%) at a VHR of 1 and 58% (IQR: 48%-66%) at a VHR of 1.5, assuming 10% population coverage.

conclusionWhile empirical validation is not yet possible due to the absence of large-scale outbreaks in Miami, our exploratory modeling provides forward-looking insights into how outbreaks might unfold and how emergency vaccination could mitigate their impact. This scenario-based framework should be viewed as an early evaluation to inform preparedness discussions, stimulate further research, and guide proactive public health strategies in Miami and other subtropical regions at risk for chikungunya.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverDisease OutbreaksVaccinationAedesAnimalsChikungunya virusFloridaHumansMosquito VectorsAedesChikungunyaMathematical modellingOutbreakVaccinationVector-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID41188786
PMCPMC12584459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.