ArticleBMC neurology2025
Phenotypic stratification of Low-grade Glioma using multimodal MRI via outcome-weighted integrative clustering.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-grade glioma (LGG) is a diverse group of primary brain tumors, whose molecular heterogeneity hinders classification by traditional pathological methods. Accurate phenotypic subtyping of LGG is essential for capturing tumor characteristics and optimizing clinical management. We intend to identify LGG phenotypic subtypes based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, enhancing prognosis evaluation and optimizing treatment strategy.
methodsThis was a retrospective multicenter study, and data were drawn from the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (FHSXMU) and Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital (SPPH) (FHSXMU/SPPH cohort, n = 162), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)/The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) (TCGA/TCIA cohort, n = 118). In the FHSXMU/SPPH cohort, LGG phenotypic subtypes were identified using the outcome-weighted integrative clustering method (survClust) based on multimodal MRI data (CE-T1 and T2FLAIR). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate survival differences between subtypes. Statistical comparisons between subtypes were performed, and the statistically significant MRI features were utilized to predict clinically relevant biomarkers - isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation combined with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Five models were constructed, including fused kernel partial least squares with the genetic algorithm (GA-fKPLS), logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and k-nearest neighbor. In the TCGA/TCIA cohort, we validated the identified phenotypic subtypes and further explored their biological characteristics by analyzing pathway activity and immune infiltration levels using mRNA expression data.
resultsTwo distinct LGG phenotypic subtypes were identified in the FHSXMU/SPPH cohort, and validated in the TCGA/TCIA cohort. In the FHSXMU/SPPH cohort, significant differences in pathological grade, MGMT promoter status, IDH genotype, survival status, tumor volume, and survival outcome (HR: 2.553, 95%CI: [1.226-5.315]) between the two subtypes (P < 0.05). Compared to other four models, the GA-fKPLS model exhibited superior predictive performance (AUC: 0.809). In the TCGA/TCIA cohort, two LGG phenotypic subtypes showed significant differences in pathway activities (JAK-STAT, TNF-α, p53) and immune cell infiltration (M2 macrophages, T cell regulatory, Monocytes) (P
conclusionThis study identified two LGG phenotypic subtypes and potential biomarkers, offering supplementary information for clinical evaluation and treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.