Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41188779›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2025

Comparative evaluation of the effect of different cleaning agents on colour and surface roughness of Invisalign clear aligners: a cross-over randomized controlled trial.

Banu Kılıç, Şeymanur Canpolat, Merve Öztürk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05213650 (Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Agents on Color and Roughness of Invisalign Clear Aligners), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05213650 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Agents on Color and Roughness of Invisalign Clear Aligners: A Cross-Over Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBezmialem Vakif UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsAligner StainingArmsnon-abrasive toothpaste, abrasive toothpaste, Efferdent, Cleaning Crystals
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Banu KılıçDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey. bkilic@bezmialem.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-4490
Şeymanur CanpolatFaculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8078-8069
Merve ÖztürkDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Health Sciences, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6006-109X

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu SA220523016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advancements in orthodontics have led to the widespread use of clear aligners, appreciated for their aesthetic and comfort advantages. However, standardized cleaning instructions remain undefined, and maintaining the surface integrity of aligners is critical for treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. Although several studies have evaluated the effects of cleaning agents, comprehensive clinical evidence regarding their impact on the colour stability and surface roughness of Invisalign aligners is still lacking. This study aims to address this gap by comparing the effects of five commonly used cleaning agents on these key properties.

objectivesTo assess the influence of various cleaning agents on both the colour and surface roughness of clear aligners. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized crossover clinical trial included 23 participants with good oral hygiene, each requiring more than 12 aligners. Participants were randomly assigned to use two different cleaning agents in two consecutive treatment phases. The agents tested were: (1) Invisalign Cleaning Crystals (Align Technology, USA), (2) Efferdent Anti-Bacterial Denture Cleanser (Prestige Brands, USA), (3) Sensodyne Rapid Relief toothpaste (GlaxoSmithKline, UK), (4) Signal White Now Whitening Toothpaste (Unilever, USA), and (5) colourant-free clear soap (La Petit Marseillaise, France). Colour measurements (ΔE) were obtained using a spectrophotometer based on the CIE Lab* system, and surface roughness was evaluated with an optical profilometer. Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using Jamovi version 2.6.26.

resultsColourant-free clear soap caused the least colour change, while the Cleaning Crystals and Whitening Toothpaste showed the highest. Control (unused) aligners had greater surface roughness than cleaned aligners. Among cleaning agents, the Cleaning Crystals group exhibited significantly higher roughness than most others (p < 0.05).

conclusionsCleaning agents influence the aesthetic and physical properties of aligners to varying degrees. Colourant-free clear soap demonstrated minimal impact on both colour and surface integrity and may be recommended as a safe and inexpensive option for daily aligner care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05213650. Registered 17 January 2022. Retrospectively registered. This randomized controlled trial adheres to the CONSORT 2010 guidelines for reporting.

Indexed as

Denture CleansersOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableAdultColorCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurface PropertiesToothpastesYoung AdultDenture CleansersToothpastesCleaning agentsClear alignersColour changeRoughness

Identifiers

PMID41188779
PMCPMC12584337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.