ArticleBMC cancer2025
Diagnostic value of super microvascular imaging in differentiating axillary lymph nodes: semi-quantitative and qualitative approach in primary breast cancer and suspicious axillary nodes.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study on predicting additional axillary lymph node positivity in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node to avoid axillary lymph node dissection.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Lymph Node Assessment with Multiparametric Ultrasound: Normal Values, Morphologic Patterns, and Diagnostic Algorithms.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe evaluation of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) using ultrasound (US) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of both quantitative and qualitative features of suspicious ALNs using superb microvascular imaging (SMI). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in the literature to evaluate the largest number of suspicious ALNs using SMI and to analyze the combined diagnostic value of these findings.
methodsOur prospective study involved 102 patients with suspicious lymph nodes in the axilla. SMI method was employed individually to assess distribution, appearance, and number of vascular structures. After histopathological or follow-up confimation, images were re-evaluated. We also examined the diagnostic value of various combinations of these vascular features. Lastly, two radiologists, each with 22 and 4 years of experience, independently reviewed the images, blinded to clinical and pathological data, to assess interobserver agreement.
resultsA total of 108 lymph nodes were evaluated in 102 patients, including 67 benign and 41 malignant cases. The diagnostic performance of various combinations in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the highest accuracy (78.70%) and area under the curve (AUC) value in ROC analysis were achieved by distribution-appearance combinations (AUC: 0.776, p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was significant for both the SMI and PDUS methods. In patients diagnosed with breast cancer, the diagnostic accuracy for suspicious axillary lymph nodes reached 92.76%, with an AUC value of 0.855.
conclusionIn conclusion, our findings suggest that SMI facilitates more accurate identification of suspicious axillary lymph nodes prior to surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.